This week, we mark the 21st anniversary of the Violence Against Women Act, a law that provides much needed funding for states, law enforcement, and nonprofit organizations for services provided to victims of violence and for the prosecution of offenders. Since its passage in 1994, VAWA has been successful in improving enforcement efforts against domestic violence, stalking and sexual assault, providing housing protection for victims, and improving educational programs to prevent crime.
But instead of standing up for our nation’s most vulnerable women, the Koch network has propped up candidates who side against expanding protections for women from sexual assault and abuse as well as pushed to strike down parts of VAWA.
Through their Koch Industries PAC, and other arms of their network, the billionaire Koch brothers have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to members of Congress who voted against VAWA:
- Senator Ron Johnson voted against reauthorizing VAWA in 2013 and 2012. Johnson has been described as “well-liked” by the Kochs, who have contributed $46,650 to his campaign since 2009.
- Senator Mitch McConnell voted against reauthorizing VAWAin 2013. Since 2009, Koch Industries has contributed $70,800 to McConnell.
- Senator John Boozeman voted against reauthorizing VAWA in 2013 Since 2008, the Koch Industries havecontributed $7,000to Boozeman.
- Senator Ted Cruz voted against reauthorizing VAWA in 2013. One of the Kochs’chosen fivepresidential candidates, Cruz has been one of the loudest advocates for the Koch agenda in Congress. Koch Industries PAC has contributed $15,000to Cruz’s Senate campaign since 2009.
- Senator Rand Paul voted against reauthorizing VAWAin 2013. Paul’s been called one of Koch backed-Americans for Prosperity’s “favorites” and Koch Industries has contributed $27,000to Paul throughout his career.
- Senator Mike Enzi voted against reauthorizing VAWA in 2013. Koch Industries has contributed $16,000 to Enzi since 2009.
- Senator Mike Lee voted against reauthorizing VAWA in 2013. Koch Industries has contributed $12,500 to Lee since 2009.
- Senator Jim Inhofe voted against reauthorizing VAWA in 2013. Koch Industries has been described as Inhofe’s “biggest” donors, contributing nearly $55,000through their PAC and lobbyists hired by the company.
- Senator Pat Roberts voted against reauthorizing VAWA in 2013. In 2014, the Kochs’Freedom Partnersspent big on tv ads to reelect him to the U.S. Senate.
- Rep. Scott Garrett voted against allowing the House to consider reauthorizing VAWA in 2013. Since 2011, Koch Industrieshas contributed $
46,000 to Garrett. - Rep. Louie Gohmert voted against allowing the House to consider reauthorizing VAWAin 2013. Since 2011, Koch Industries has contributed $23,500to Gohmert.
- Rep. Tim Huelskamp voted against allowing the House to consider reauthorizing VAWAin 2013. Since 2011, Koch Industries has contributed $35,000to Huelskamp.
- Rep. Matt Salmon voted against allowing the House to consider reauthorizing VAWA in 2013.
In 2014, the Kochs’ AFP awarded Salmon their “Leader of Liberty” award. Since 2013, Salmon has received $9,000 in contributions from Koch Industries.
But there’s more. Two arms of the Koch empire, the Institute for Justice, which the Kochs provided seed money for, and CATO, which was founded by Charles Koch and currently counts David Koch as a board member, were leaders in the push to strike down part of VAWA.
In 1999, the groups teamed up for a Supreme Court amicus brief in an attempt to strike down part of VAWA. Outside of the brief, IFJ and CATO were outspoken on the case. Outside of the brief, both groups were very vocal in criticizing VAWA, including IFJ insisting VAWA “was never about women’s rights.”
The Kochs invite themselves to be judged by the company they keep. Through their more than generous backing of candidates who refused to support the Violence Against Women Act as well as their groups’ leadership in the fight to roll back protections for victims of domestic violence, the Kochs have sent the message to women across the country that they don’t care about women’s health care and economic interests.